Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Going Green Isn't Actually So Green

Everyday I stare at the “TP Times” Be Green issue and the blue recycling bins that litter every dorm and classroom on campus. Not only is recycling everywhere, I am asked to take an entirely separate trip to recycle plastics #1-7, paper, junk mail, aluminum cans, glass bottles and cardboard. I remember a time when people just threw all that stuff into a single garbage bin that was magically whisked away by Waste Management each Friday. It involved fewer trips and a lot fewer bins.

Have you ever actually thought about recycling: what really happens to all that “stuff” after you drop it off and how it turns from a fifth of McCormick’s you hid in your bottom drawer to the “Naked Juice” you had for breakfast? Or is it actually even reused to make the plastic we use everyday? According to the Ecology Center online, “none of the recovered plastic containers are being made into containers again but into new secondary products such as textiles, parking lot bumpers, or plastic lumber – all unrecyclable products.” Not only are the products we are encouraged to recycle converted into environmentally unfriendly goods, an immense amount of energy is required to do this. Recycling plastic uses as much or more energy to alter its original state than it does to produce. It takes more energy to produce recycled products than it does to dispose of them in traditional landfill methods thereby increasing the production of greenhouse gases. Moreover, everything else we are asked to recycle is seemingly pointless. Glass is made from sand. The Earth is not running out of sand. Newspapers, when buried, stay intact for decades and, when burned, become mere ashes. So, why recycle?

In addition to having to stare at my RA’s new “Go Green” board every time I walk to my room, I am now being forced to go tray less every Tuesday with “Trayless Tuesdays.” It’s an epidemic sweeping college campuses nationwide. The DU Clarion claims it is being implemented “to reduce food waste, water waste and help students avoid the freshman 15.” Personally, I think this is a bunch of nonsense. “What are they going to think of next? Forkless Fridays? Spoonless Saturdays? Maybe you can implement Starving Sundays and simply not serve food once a week,” an anonymous anti-green author joked. That will really help kids avoid the dreaded first year weight gain.

However, the issue of going “trayless” to help decrease food waste once a week seems miniscule compared to the food waste epidemic in Mexico. According to John Tierney’s article, Recycling Is Garbage, “The typical household in Mexico City buys fewer packaged goods than an American household, but it produces one-third more garbage, chiefly because Mexicans buy fresh foods in bulk and throw away large unused, spoiled, and stale portions.” Those fruits, vegetables and other perishable packaged foods are protected by plastic wrap and foam are less likely to biodegrade. The lightweight plastic packaging requires much less energy to manufacture and transport than traditional alternatives like cardboard or paper. Food companies have switched to plastic packaging because they make money by using resources efficiently. So why are we so worried about our 1520 pounds of waste and companies use of plastic when it’s plastic itself that’s helping prevent the excessive waste of food? Shouldn’t we be trying to do something about the 5100 tons of waste that Mexico City produces daily? I think we are focused on the wrong thing here. Instead of being mindless trend followers, we should inform ourselves of what the true issues at hand are. If everyone is so preoccupied with “making a difference” and “change” maybe we should direct our focus elsewhere.

I’ve got a suggestion for those of you who are really truly concerned and think that Trayless Tuesdays is our small step to making big difference in the long run: next year when you are applying for study abroad and you are totally amped to going skiing in the Swiss Alps or surfing with your bros down under, reconsider. Maybe what you should be doing is going down to Mexico and helping sort out all the garbage. If you are really as concerned with food waste as you make it seem every Tuesday when you hang out by the empty tray racks, Mexico probably is the place for you to go. So read up and pack some plastic gloves because things are going to get dirty down there.

There has also been a huge fuss over our excessive use of plastic bags. Huge posters hang in the JMac lobby informing us of just how many plastic bags we use on a daily, monthly and yearly basis. However, there is one small thing that is being overlooked, instead of using plastic bags, people have started switching to paper bags. All the “greenies” are too concerned with lack of plastic bag decay in landfills but according to American Chemistry Online “plastic grocery bags require 70 percent less energy to manufacture, produce 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions and create five times less waste than bulky paper bags.” Paper, cardboard and other organic materials are technically biodegradable but tend to remain intact in the airless confines of a landfill and actually use much more space than plastic packaging. Twelve plastic grocery bags fit the space occupied by one paper bag. So I am confused here, why is everyone making such a big deal about plastic harming the environment when not using plastic would prove to be more harmful?

For all of you out there who are rolling your eyes and thinking, “If it takes a long time for paper to decompose, why don’t we just recycle it or better yet not use it at all, after all we are ‘killing trees,’” then boy do I have some fun facts for you! STOP WORRYING ABOUT THE DAMN TREES! Magazines, publishing companies and newspapers aren’t marching into the forest and chopping down trees to make paper, they use tree farms. Tree farms are farms that grow trees for the sole purpose of producing paper. The trees are grown with the intention of being cut down at some point to make the books, magazines and newspapers that we all love to read. So here’s some advice, stop feeling so bad every time you walk into Borders and thinking of all the trees that were killed in order to make the books inside, instead start helping fuel the economy and buy a few. Not only will you feel better about your contribution to the market but it may come in handy; after all if you buy a big enough book you may just be able to use it as a substitute to a tray on Tuesdays.

So what is the answer…well maybe there is not just one. We all have to practice our own form of recycling. Maybe it is using an old piece of funky used furniture we picked up from Goodwill or turning that vintage dress into a cool, hip ensemble. We all should continue to recycle whatever way we choose rather than following the dictatorial attitudes of a flier, a university, or the media.

3 comments:

  1. I believe that some of the points you made regarding recycling are valid, that in some cases recycling might create more greenhouse gasses then simply disposing in traditional landfills but what I think is overlooked is the fact that the world is running out of places to put our trash. Our landfills are filling with wastes that can be recycled and thus save room for things that cannot. Your correct in your assertion that we are not running out of sand but that doesn’t mean that we should continue producing glass. Yes sand is abundant but space for throwing away this product is limited. Likewise paper bags may take more space in a landfill and more energy to produce then a plastic bag but they biodegrade and allow for more space in the future while plastic bags simply don’t.
    -Bryan C.

    ReplyDelete
  2. First of all I would like to make a comment about the compliant of extra trips to the recycle bins. It may be a slight inconvenience, but really whining about an extra trip down the hall is not going to convince me to agree that recycling is not a good idea. To me, complaining is not particularly persuasive- recycling still helps the environment. I would also like to comment on “trayless Tuesdays.” I do not understand your points because the benefits are quite obvious. So much water is saved and so much food goes un-wasted because of this. Just think about yourself- when you have that tray you are probably more likely to get more food because you can carry it and, if not, you don’t need a tray because two hands is enough to carry a meal and a drink. And the exaggeration of jumping to “starving Sundays” is absolutely ridiculous. You must know that these two things are nowhere near the same thing. Reducing waste of food and water does not equate to starvation of students. Furthermore, you tried to make a point about how using plastic bags is better, but you do not think in the long run. Over time, it will take less energy if we all use paper bags because those can be recycled and we won’t need to continue to go out and get new raw materials, unlike plastic bags that need to be constantly manufactured as well as take up space on this planet not biodegrading. Also, I enjoyed that bit about waste in Mexico- maybe they need to implement something like trayless Tuesdays down there so that they will waste less food and have less trash…

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have actually thought about recycling and that is why I know its not pointless. Global sand loss is not a top priority, although depleted beaches are a growing concern. We recycle glass to save oil (a huge concern). Newspapers come from trees. A newspaper sitting in a landfill is a tree sitting in a landfill. Plastic might be recycled into non renewable resources, but why create more plastic when we have it already available? Recycling uses energy, sure, but so does extracting more resources. Why you see reducing food and water waste as "nonsense" is never explained. Using plastic bags is not better for the environment. You are misinformed to use paper bags. The solution is to use a reusable bag. There are tote bags made out of hemp and bamboo (both renewable fibers) widely available. Buy a messenger bag and you can bike to your grocery store. I'm sorry you find a walking to a recycling station an inconvenience, but some people really enjoy walking, to the point where they spend days doing it up a mountain, let alone the few extra minutes it takes to get to the recycling station. Refusing to take those few extra steps ruins the future walks for others, as not recycling ruins the environment (newspaper/tree connection), which the mountains exist in.

    ReplyDelete